Are Laws Prohibiting Cell Phone Use While Driving Effective?

Aug 26, 2014 | Auto Accidents

Recent reports provide conflicting evidence as to whether banning drivers’ use of cell phones is a proper way to fight the increase in distracted driving accidents.

Statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Drive Smart Virginia initiative have been widely used in recent years to raise awareness about the dangers of distracted driving.

Many reports have stated that using a cell phone to talk or text while behind the wheel is the most hazardous form of distracted driving and that it has led to a high number of crashes on our nation’s roads.

But now comes a report from the journal, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, whichfinds that cell phone bans may not be effective.

Study: Distracted Driving Law Had Little Impact in California

As Science Direct reports, researchers analyzed accidents in California in the six months before and after that state’s driver cell phone ban was adopted in 2008. They found little impact on traffic safety.

Researchers found the number of car accidents in California only dropped from 66.7 per day to 65.2 per day statewide, “a statistically minor decline,” according to Autoblog.

“It was pretty clear to us that there was no compelling evidence of a decrease in accidents,” Daniel Kaffine, one of the study’s authors, told Autoblog.

Autoblog also cites a study of insurance claims in 2009 and 2010 by the Highway Loss Data Institute, the research arm of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which found no link between cell phone bans and a decrease in crashes.

Key Question: What Type of Distracted Driving Ban?

But at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, researchers who examined texting-while-driving bans have found that the impact of such laws depends on how the law is written and enforced.

“Our results indicated that primary texting bans were significantly associated with a 3 percent reduction in traffic fatalities among all age groups, which equates to an average of 19 deaths prevented per year in states with such bans,” study author Alva O. Ferdinand, Dr.P.H., J.D., said in a news release.

“Primarily enforced texting laws that banned only young drivers from texting were the most effective at reducing deaths among the 15-to-21-year-old cohort, with an associated 11 percent reduction in traffic fatalities among this age group in states with such bans.”

A primary law is one in which a driver can be cited for the specific violation such as using a cell phone behind the wheel or texting while driving. Under a secondary law, a law enforcement officer must have another reason to stop the driver such as speeding before a distracted driving citation can be issued.

What is the Distracted Driving Law in Virginia?

Virginia’s ban on texting for all drivers is a primary law. However, the state’s ban on all cell phone use for novice drivers (hand-held and hands-free) is a secondary law. The ban on all cell phone use by bus drivers is a primary law.

The NHTSA reports that 44 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands ban text messaging for all drivers. Twelve states, D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands prohibit all drivers from using hand-held cell phones while driving.

Study findings may continue to conflict as these fairly new laws are studied. But it seems that any measure that refocuses a driver’s attention on the road surely contributes to overall highway safety.

Geoff McDonald and Associates: 804-888-8888.

FREE CONSULTATION

No Fees Unless We Win





    The Person That Hit Me Does Not Have Insurance, What Can I Do?

    Accidents involving uninsured or underinsured drivers are far more common than you might expect. One in eight drivers on the road doesn’t have insurance. That’s why you should have uninsured motorists coverage on your policy to protect yourself and your vehicle in...

    Do I Still Have a Case if I Do Not Have Auto Insurance?

    Yes, if you were injured in a car accident and someone else is at fault for that accident, you have a claim against the at-fault party’s insurance company. If the insurance company fails to pay as it should, you can pursue legal action against the company....

    Our Case Results

    $4,700,000
    Industrial Plant Accident

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Breit and Justin M. Sheldon Our client was killed in an industrial accident when an unauthorized worker was operating an overhead crane and pinned our client between…

    $1,750,000
    Rear-End Crash

    Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury, facial trauma, a dislocated hip and severe abdominal trauma when she was rear-ended at a traffic light by a tractor trailer. Suit was commenced shortly after…

    $1,250,000
    Assault of Log Truck Driver

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Geoffrey R. McDonald, Frank H. Hupfl, Justin M. Sheldon.
    Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury after being assaulted and knocked to the ground while fueling his logging…

    $860,000
    Drunk Driving Crash

    Our client suffered neck/head trauma and a broken wrist after his vehicle was struck by a drunk driver while he was stopped at a traffic light. Upon rejection of a settlement offer of $325,000, our litigation…

    $700,000
    Rear-End Collision

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Justin M. Sheldon and Geoff R. McDonald, Richmond
    GMA’s client was injured as a result of a rear-end collision in the greater Richmond area. The crash occurred a little after…

    Client Reviews

    Cheryl and Rich were wonderful and patient with me throughout the case. All of my questions were answered. They really helped me through this tough time and made sure to let me know what was going on. I really thank Geoff…

    Troy Saxby

    My experience with GMA staff was first rate. They always represented in a professional way and made sure I had everything as far as paperwork. Kara and Theo made sure to answer all my questions, was always available and so…

    Shirley Brown

    Geoff McDonald & Associates is the team that you want on the field if you’re in need of top notch legal defense! Mr. Taj Henley demonstrated true customer service skills and his expertise made me feel comfortable throughout the…

    Julian Reeves

    Geoff McDonald & Associates: Thank you Taj Henley for all of your hard work and dedication! Very expeditious in my case and I was very satisfied with my settlement. Will recommend to all my friends and family!

    Shareema Williams

    Geoff is number one in my book and I especially appreciate the support of Mr Henley

    Ebony Conwell

    I was so pleased with the knowledge and support from Mr. Taj Henley

    Kideem Frierson

    Thank you Geoff McDonald &Associates. A special thank you to Mr. Taj Henley

    Denise Conwell

    Mr. Taj Henley displays exceptional professionalism for Geoff McDonald & Associates, along with commendable communication skills and customer service. By his work ethic and commitment to the people he serves his value to any…

    Justin Fitzgerald