WANT A FREE BIKE? ENTER TODAY FOR YOUR CHANCE TO WIN. ENTER HERE

Can I Sue the Owner of the Property Where I Was Injured in Virginia?

Aug 31, 2021 | Personal Injury

 

Premises liability claims are among the most common and most expensive personal injury claims. Falls are a good example. These incidents are not only the leading cause of emergency room visits in Virginia, they also cost over $70 billion per year in medical bills alone. Other types of premises liability claims include dog bites, swimming pool drownings, and injuries related to negligent security.

 

Medical bills are just one portion of the compensation that a Richmond personal injury attorney can obtain in these cases. Compensation is also available for other economic losses such as lost wages, as well as noneconomic losses such as pain and suffering. 

 

Since homeowners’ insurance usually has higher coverage limits than car insurance, the maximum compensation is available in premises liability claims. Although every matter is different, they usually involve the following three areas.

 

Setting the Duty of Care

Negligence is a failure to adhere to duty – in this case, the duty of care held by the property owner. In Virginia and most other states, this duty largely depends on the relationship between the victim and property owner as follows:

  • Invitee: Most premises liability victims are invitees. The owner gives these individuals permission to be on the property. Furthermore, the owner benefits, either economically or non-economically, because of their presence. Largely because of this benefit, owners usually have a duty of reasonable care in these situations.
  • Licensee: Some victims have direct or indirect permission to visit the property, but there is no benefit to the owner. Because When there is no benefit, the owner usually has only a duty to warn about latent (hidden) property defects which could cause injury.
  • Trespasser: Typically, if there is no permission and no benefit, there is no duty of care. Although there are a few exceptions like the attractive nuisance rule, tales of injured burglars who successfully sue homeowners for damages are mostly urban legends.

If an owner has a duty of care, knows about a hazard like a wet spot on a floor or a vicious dog, and does not address the hazard, the owner and their insurance provider may be financially responsible for damages that occur. 

 

Establishing Knowledge

This knowledge could be actual or constructive (should have known). In both situations, the burden of proof is a preponderance of the evidence, or more likely than not.

 

Direct evidence of actual knowledge often surfaces during the lawsuit’s discovery process. For example, an owner might admit during a deposition that they knew the dog was vicious or that the floor was unsafe.

 

More often than not, however, victim/plaintiffs must use circumstantial evidence to establish constructive knowledge. The time-notice rule normally applies. If the hazard had been a potential problem for some time, the owner should have known about it and should have addressed it. What constitutes a reasonable amount of time mostly depends on the facts.

 

Refuting Insurance Company Defenses

Since Virginia is a pure contributory negligence state, if the victim is even 1 percent responsible for the accident, the victim is ineligible for compensation. Falls usually involve some variation of the open and obvious defense. Essentially, the insurance company argues that the victim didn’t watch where they were going. But not all hazards are “open and obvious” to everyone. For example, many older victims have impaired vision. Avoiding hazards that are open and obvious to other people is a problem for them.

 

Get Legal Assistance for Your Personal Injury Case – Free Consultations

Most property owners have a legal duty to keep guests reasonably safe. For a free consultation with an experienced personal injury attorney in Richmond, contact Geoff McDonald & Associates, P.C. Attorneys can connect victims with doctors even if they have no insurance or money.

Geoff McDonald and Associates: 866-369-9051.

FREE CONSULTATION

No Fees Unless We Win





    Can I Sue a Driver Who Hits Me When I’m in a Crosswalk?

    Yes, at least in most cases. However, in Virginia, a crosswalk injury lawsuit is much more complex than it is in most other states. As outlined below, the answer often depends on the color of the light at the crosswalk.   In 2019, although the number of overall...

    If I Am Injured While My Spouse Is Driving, Can I Sue My Spouse?

    Legally, nothing prevents you from taking legal action in a spouse-involved car accident. There is no relevant spousal immunity provision in Virginia. However, there are some obvious emotional issues to consider in these cases. There are some additional legal issues...

    Can I sue my landlord if I’m injured at home?

    In Virginia, landlords have a legal duty to ensure that their tenants are reasonably safe. This duty applies to private areas, like apartment units, as well as swimming pools, stairwells, parking lots, and other common areas. Falls, dog bites, and swimming pool...

    Our Case Results

    $4,700,000
    Industrial Plant Accident

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Breit and Justin M. Sheldon Our client was killed in an industrial accident when an unauthorized worker was operating an overhead crane and pinned our client between…

    $1,750,000
    Rear-End Crash

    Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury, facial trauma, a dislocated hip and severe abdominal trauma when she was rear-ended at a traffic light by a tractor trailer. Suit was commenced shortly after…

    $1,250,000
    Assault of Log Truck Driver

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Geoffrey R. McDonald, Frank H. Hupfl, Justin M. Sheldon.
    Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury after being assaulted and knocked to the ground while fueling his logging…

    $860,000
    Drunk Driving Crash

    Our client suffered neck/head trauma and a broken wrist after his vehicle was struck by a drunk driver while he was stopped at a traffic light. Upon rejection of a settlement offer of $325,000, our litigation…

    $700,000
    Rear-End Collision

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Justin M. Sheldon and Geoff R. McDonald, Richmond
    GMA’s client was injured as a result of a rear-end collision in the greater Richmond area. The crash occurred a little after…

    Client Reviews

    Cheryl and Rich were wonderful and patient with me throughout the case. All of my questions were answered. They really helped me through this tough time and made sure to let me know what was going on. I really thank Geoff…

    Troy Saxby

    My experience with GMA staff was first rate. They always represented in a professional way and made sure I had everything as far as paperwork. Kara and Theo made sure to answer all my questions, was always available and so…

    Shirley Brown

    Geoff McDonald & Associates is the team that you want on the field if you’re in need of top notch legal defense! Mr. Taj Henley demonstrated true customer service skills and his expertise made me feel comfortable throughout the…

    Julian Reeves

    Geoff McDonald & Associates: Thank you Taj Henley for all of your hard work and dedication! Very expeditious in my case and I was very satisfied with my settlement. Will recommend to all my friends and family!

    Shareema Williams

    Geoff is number one in my book and I especially appreciate the support of Mr Henley

    Ebony Conwell

    I was so pleased with the knowledge and support from Mr. Taj Henley

    Kideem Frierson

    Thank you Geoff McDonald &Associates. A special thank you to Mr. Taj Henley

    Denise Conwell

    Mr. Taj Henley displays exceptional professionalism for Geoff McDonald & Associates, along with commendable communication skills and customer service. By his work ethic and commitment to the people he serves his value to any…

    Justin Fitzgerald