Geoff McDonald & Associates wins the biggest settlement for Virginia in 2020 for $38.2 Million. Click for details.

Developer’s Story Shows Struggles of Using Tech to Fight Texting While Driving

Sep 25, 2014 | Auto Accident News

A recent story in the New York Times highlights a Colorado man’s struggles to develop and distribute technology that can stop people from texting while driving. As his story illustrates, technology alone likely won’t solve this issue.

The developer, Scott Tibbitts, created a wireless network-based way to block drivers from using their phones and from sending or reading texts while operating their vehicles, according to the Times. The technology is seen as a step up from existing GPS-based blocking systems.

However, a network partner that at one time seemed to be along for the ride, Sprint, has stalled on the project, the Times reports. The company cited concerns about liability if the device failed.

However, as the article speculates, Sprint may have simply seen a lack of market demand. The reality may be that consumers are more interested in being connected while driving instead of being safe.

Innovative System Uses ‘Telematics’

To work effectively, a system that blocks drivers from texting or talking on a phone while driving must know that the person is, in fact, driving.

Many existing apps rely on GPS systems to indicate when a person is driving, including the Sprint Drive First app, AT&T DriveMode app and an app provided by Aegis Mobility.

However, GPS-based systems have their drawbacks. First, drivers can easily bypass them. Second, using GPS systems can quickly drain a phone’s battery, as the Times describes.

Tibbitts’ system seeks to solve that problem by using “telematics,” or a combination of telecommunications and mobility. In particular, the system works by plugging a telematics box into an OBD 2 port found in most cars today.

The box transmits a message to the wireless network which conveys that the car is moving and gives its location. This message is fed to servers, which are able to determine whose phone it is and to block all texts, calls and e-mails to that phone.

Sprint Wavers in Support of New Technology

On one hand, the environment is perfect for this new technology to flourish, the Times points out.

In the past, cell phone carriers charged users by the minute. They had no incentive to stop drivers from texting or talking while driving. However, today, many carriers offer unlimited use and earn money by getting fees from insurance companies for carrying wireless connections on their networks.

Sprint, for instance joined support of Tibbitts’ project along with an insurance company, American Family Insurance.

However, on the other hand, maybe the public isn’t ready for blocking technology. As the Times points out, relatively few drivers have adopted GPS-based systems, and Sprint may have recently wavered in its support of Tibbitts’ network-based system because “costs were mounting, [and] the returns unclear.”

‘This Is a Behavior Problem’

Ultimately, as Tibbitts’ concedes, texting while driving is a “behavior problem.” It may take many years before anti-texting technology is not only developed but also accepted by the public.

Technology, in this sense, is just one part of a multi-pronged approach to solving this issue. We must also continue to raise awareness of the dangers of texting while driving, pass tough laws and enforce those laws.

Geoff McDonald and Associates: 866-369-9051.

FREE CONSULTATION

No Fees Unless We Win





    New distracted driving laws

    On January 21, 2021, Virginia became one of the only states in the country with a comprehensive distracted driving law. It is now illegal for drivers to hold and use a cell phone in the Old Dominion. The previous law had very limited applicability.   Hand-held...

    How Long Can It Take to Resolve a Car Accident Claim in Virginia?

    You may have heard that every car accident claim is different. This sounds cliché, sort of like when a professional athlete tells a reporter he or she is trying to take it one game at a time. However, every claim is different. That means there is no...

    Why Are Left-Turn Crashes So Common and Who is Usually at Fault?

    Left turns are some of the most dangerous traffic maneuvers you can make. You are cutting across traffic heading in the opposite direction. When you are turning right you can speed up and potentially prevent being hit from behind. However, when you are turning left,...

    What Are Your Options After a Car Insurance Claim Denial?

    There is often a lot of uncertainty and confusion after a car crash. The uncertainty and confusion are only heightened when the insurance company denies the claim. Victims often do not know what to do next. You may be unsure if you still have a chance to obtain...

    How Can an Attorney Prove an At-Fault Driver Was Distracted?

    Distracted driving is incredibly dangerous and is known to lead to significant injuries and fatal car crashes. If you were injured by a distracted driver in Virginia, you may be able to recover compensation for your damages. But how can you prove that the other driver...

    Our Case Results

    $4,700,000
    Industrial Plant Accident

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Breit and Justin M. Sheldon Our client was killed in an industrial accident when an unauthorized worker was operating an overhead crane and pinned our client between…

    $1,750,000
    Rear-End Crash

    Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury, facial trauma, a dislocated hip and severe abdominal trauma when she was rear-ended at a traffic light by a tractor trailer. Suit was commenced shortly after…

    $1,250,000
    Assault of Log Truck Driver

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Geoffrey R. McDonald, Frank H. Hupfl, Justin M. Sheldon.
    Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury after being assaulted and knocked to the ground while fueling his logging…

    $860,000
    Drunk Driving Crash

    Our client suffered neck/head trauma and a broken wrist after his vehicle was struck by a drunk driver while he was stopped at a traffic light. Upon rejection of a settlement offer of $325,000, our litigation…

    $700,000
    Rear-End Collision

    Attorneys for the Plaintiff: Justin M. Sheldon and Geoff R. McDonald, Richmond
    GMA’s client was injured as a result of a rear-end collision in the greater Richmond area. The crash occurred a little after…

    Client Reviews

    Cheryl and Rich were wonderful and patient with me throughout the case. All of my questions were answered. They really helped me through this tough time and made sure to let me know what was going on. I really thank Geoff…

    Troy Saxby

    My experience with GMA staff was first rate. They always represented in a professional way and made sure I had everything as far as paperwork. Kara and Theo made sure to answer all my questions, was always available and so…

    Shirley Brown

    Geoff McDonald & Associates is the team that you want on the field if you’re in need of top notch legal defense! Mr. Taj Henley demonstrated true customer service skills and his expertise made me feel comfortable throughout the…

    Julian Reeves

    Geoff McDonald & Associates: Thank you Taj Henley for all of your hard work and dedication! Very expeditious in my case and I was very satisfied with my settlement. Will recommend to all my friends and family!

    Shareema Williams

    Geoff is number one in my book and I especially appreciate the support of Mr Henley

    Ebony Conwell

    I was so pleased with the knowledge and support from Mr. Taj Henley

    Kideem Frierson

    Thank you Geoff McDonald &Associates. A special thank you to Mr. Taj Henley

    Denise Conwell

    Mr. Taj Henley displays exceptional professionalism for Geoff McDonald & Associates, along with commendable communication skills and customer service. By his work ethic and commitment to the people he serves his value to any…

    Justin Fitzgerald